From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
	id C8B833854576; Mon, 21 Nov 2022 13:40:59 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org C8B833854576
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
	s=default; t=1669038059;
	bh=4RZIjjqDBteR8OuXJ54q2axb0tTBwkoZgKlshywIVRQ=;
	h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
	b=v2SydmgQvxftw3mUQkKEFxEWeC2XHMYqVlE+Ewds5mDnZTzgGXZXDqtBEJWpsxTwR
	 fsujmbthnkbPKmauzZV6aMASuzGS4cAWJ+yrlWqhvfC40SGtLvCwghFIuRoRJvBcMP
	 LEcETnUBxBUtDZV2+vdMjfAyXodzt1471EIjL60o=
From: "redi at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug libstdc++/107792] Output of default contract violation handler
 could be improved
Date: Mon, 21 Nov 2022 13:40:54 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: libstdc++
X-Bugzilla-Version: 13.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: diagnostic
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: redi at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: 
Message-ID: <bug-107792-4-eFrw8juzLi@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-107792-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-107792-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D107792

--- Comment #1 from Jonathan Wakely <redi at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #0)
> default std::handle_contract_violation called:=20

N.B. The function is not in namespace std.

This seems better:

default handle_contract_violation called [default:default:NEVER]
in function f at fail.cc:1: r > 0
terminate called without an active exception
Aborted (core dumped)


We could say "[level:default role:default continue:NEVER]" instead if the
shorter form is too obscure.

Maybe instead of saying the default handler was called, we should just say a
contract was violated. That's what users actually care about, not the handl=
er
itself:

contract violation in function f at fail.cc:1: r > 0
[level:default, role:default, continuation mode:never]
terminate called without an active exception
Aborted (core dumped)=