From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
	id A22B33858C1F; Tue, 22 Nov 2022 12:30:31 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org A22B33858C1F
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
	s=default; t=1669120231;
	bh=E9uH1rkcsM1/Up/UhRV9HPgO/L2barxFljTZ5MFXHPM=;
	h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
	b=pM2DV9lkV72NbTwC8KFHmmJxxUMq/h2kXrbk6YbRy3GCLofsi4lI8vOGzeTVhltK7
	 ZFLQSTNUB+UWGih4FyLEbtH9Eui93pZiX/wrthRxXNj9LwhaOMi53lA8BeCKnOw+7n
	 HQaraIuWztle06bBj2GJH0UitW+7+7reHXcGvTz8=
From: "avieira at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug tree-optimization/107808] gcc.dg/vect/vect-bitfield-write-2.c
 etc.FAIL
Date: Tue, 22 Nov 2022 12:30:31 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: tree-optimization
X-Bugzilla-Version: 13.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: 
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: avieira at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 13.0
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: 
Message-ID: <bug-107808-4-PSnKDzxdxK@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-107808-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-107808-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D107808

--- Comment #2 from avieira at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Hi Rainer,

I suspect this means SPARC should be added to the list of targets that fail
check_effective_target_vect_long_long. From the dump it looks like the targ=
et
doesn't support a long long vectype.=