From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
	id 62B7F3858C50; Tue, 22 Nov 2022 12:14:25 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 62B7F3858C50
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
	s=default; t=1669119265;
	bh=0eikvqGwkzqhU6INbS6kKCmOIhQY7bO7Z2BFSrWi7k4=;
	h=From:To:Subject:Date:From;
	b=PXdDWSDvaYNFq+CbHQ5SJdNEKW1eFWhx2y532CFdvvpgl+5wshTTZ65S6Gtdh+lNH
	 Qn6XEk8htTLyyUNfWgvhwcJnkCuJt/QFxlrNJWSFtoE62JKQ9iySlaPBBJVzoF9u4G
	 7pMCp85/0dm/J6depusncxtWlrJi4MSxDj2/7iZc=
From: "ro at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug tree-optimization/107809] New: gcc.dg/vect/vect-recurr-1.c etc.
 FAIL
Date: Tue, 22 Nov 2022 12:14:25 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: new
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: tree-optimization
X-Bugzilla-Version: 13.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: 
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: ro at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_id short_desc product version bug_status
 bug_severity priority component assigned_to reporter target_milestone
 cf_gcctarget
Message-ID: <bug-107809-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D107809

            Bug ID: 107809
           Summary: gcc.dg/vect/vect-recurr-1.c etc. FAIL
           Product: gcc
           Version: 13.0
            Status: UNCONFIRMED
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P3
         Component: tree-optimization
          Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
          Reporter: ro at gcc dot gnu.org
  Target Milestone: ---
            Target: sparc*-sun-solaris2.11

Since their introduction, the vect-recurr-?.c tests FAIL on 32 and 64-bit
SPARC:

+FAIL: gcc.dg/vect/vect-recurr-1.c -flto -ffat-lto-objects  scan-tree-dump =
vect
"vectorized 1 loops in function"
+FAIL: gcc.dg/vect/vect-recurr-1.c scan-tree-dump vect "vectorized 1 loops =
in
function"
+FAIL: gcc.dg/vect/vect-recurr-2.c -flto -ffat-lto-objects  scan-tree-dump =
vect
"vectorized 1 loops in function"
+FAIL: gcc.dg/vect/vect-recurr-2.c scan-tree-dump vect "vectorized 1 loops =
in
function"
+FAIL: gcc.dg/vect/vect-recurr-3.c -flto -ffat-lto-objects  scan-tree-dump =
vect
"vectorized 1 loops in function"
+FAIL: gcc.dg/vect/vect-recurr-3.c scan-tree-dump vect "vectorized 1 loops =
in
function"
+FAIL: gcc.dg/vect/vect-recurr-4.c -flto -ffat-lto-objects  scan-tree-dump =
vect
"vectorized 1 loops in function"
+FAIL: gcc.dg/vect/vect-recurr-4.c scan-tree-dump vect "vectorized 1 loops =
in
function"
+FAIL: gcc.dg/vect/vect-recurr-5.c -flto -ffat-lto-objects  scan-tree-dump =
vect
"vectorized 1 loops in function"
+FAIL: gcc.dg/vect/vect-recurr-5.c scan-tree-dump vect "vectorized 1 loops =
in
function"

Dump attached.=