From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
	id 975CB3854578; Wed, 23 Nov 2022 10:08:15 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 975CB3854578
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
	s=default; t=1669198095;
	bh=QRLvQj9YkEZpc1piVlIAiqXVttrbspGm4c3Xe8Ek1dg=;
	h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
	b=K190SlL2nqi8rQqqKfFyY+fvxtmXJjJa65hwA6vnjf2D/+vnQL431UdYXPmf1tRfN
	 BG783bzZU85leTu+iA6sfH5d0aJg6Crth1oF/kvcQlZMVeRvPZ6Dcf4+BfvGtZXscm
	 ghn2+Ns/qhdwxMvbzscKF1Ti5IJ2OePpA5YBzMDw=
From: "ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug libstdc++/107814] [13 regression]
 experimental/filesystem/iterators/error_reporting.cc FAILs
Date: Wed, 23 Nov 2022 10:08:15 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: libstdc++
X-Bugzilla-Version: 13.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: 
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 13.0
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: 
Message-ID: <bug-107814-4-gCKbpcnOLu@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-107814-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-107814-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D107814

--- Comment #5 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE <ro at CeBiTec dot U=
ni-Bielefeld.DE> ---
> --- Comment #4 from Jonathan Wakely <redi at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
> I think I'll push the patch in comment 2 and we can see if it helps :-)

I've just tried it on sparc and x86, 32 and 64-bit: the test PASSes
everywhere now.  Thanks a lot.=