From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48) id E779238518AF; Thu, 24 Nov 2022 09:41:46 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org E779238518AF DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org; s=default; t=1669282906; bh=hKFj3yRPVnvusGXYQu4ZKaGKqzfvXfWMYR52jqC7dmo=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=f/3gakLZOEZolLSWsCmKDJqeJ4LGgw7JDpC8baAEsHt1kv+mrGDTWHp4mxw/H8Oiy YK32w4OGW2KYMW0G89he187SA1dJGGql9zUfUAJHdAYXlQcLsKPXbY0mDxsP9GlsOf uK3dxjeR4eRb050gzzOlTI8NBED4s2SyRNsLgUn4= From: "jakub at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug libstdc++/107815] 20_util/to_chars/float128_c++23.cc FAILs Date: Thu, 24 Nov 2022 09:41:46 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: libstdc++ X-Bugzilla-Version: 13.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 13.0 X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: cc Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 List-Id: https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D107815 Jakub Jelinek changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |danglin at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #13 from Jakub Jelinek --- If it fails on HPUX, I think we need more information. Whether it is just max() case that fails there too or some other, and whether it fails for the same reason or some other one (e.g. one can run the https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D107815#c5 test and see what it prints).=