From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
	id 887A0385514D; Mon, 28 Nov 2022 09:12:06 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 887A0385514D
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
	s=default; t=1669626726;
	bh=7laLSoxtyaH/2D/2ufJ5gGeVVlXvWSgDGLB+p5BIfMg=;
	h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
	b=LrST/sh2IyyVqnQcvWiIUoOwSMqo+qf3ySnH5Zd0lyGut+Tnt9JOiItqK6lUcplJH
	 8AhBSCUlb9JLiyfMUQ2VUfMRrO8ZS4J1xuJBhikKFsivhObtEtyyuAVf18yueqQ8QN
	 VHXnv07kvueCh58yOk6trUckyrF8qjhsd5qeZ4pU=
From: "jakub at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug libstdc++/107815] 20_util/to_chars/float128_c++23.cc FAILs
Date: Mon, 28 Nov 2022 09:12:03 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: libstdc++
X-Bugzilla-Version: 13.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: 
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 13.0
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: 
Message-ID: <bug-107815-4-W8yO0LtWti@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-107815-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-107815-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D107815

--- Comment #17 from Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to dave.anglin from comment #16)
> This is what the test prints:
> 6.47518e-4966 6e-4966
> xxx.cc:79: void test(std::chars_format): Assertion 'ec4 =3D=3D std::errc(=
) &&
> ptr4 =3D=3D ptr1' failed.
> ABORT instruction (core dumped)

Ah, ok, so it is a different case, the
    std::numeric_limits<std::float128_t>::denorm_min(),
one.
6e-4966 is I believe the correct shortest scientific string representation =
of
the value, because nexttoward{l,f128} of that value in one direction is 0 (=
in
fixed or 0e+00 in scientific) and in the other direction is 12.95036e-4966
(1e-4965
in shortest scientific) and one further step 19.42554e-4966 (2e-4965 in
shortest scientific).
What fails is the from_chars for you, and from_chars when not hexadecimal
always
uses strto* functions, so I presume what HP-UX mishandles is:
#include <stdlib.h>

int
main ()
{
  char *end;
  const char *p =3D "6e-4966";
  long double l =3D strtold (p, &end);
  if (l !=3D __LDBL_DENORM_MIN__ || end !=3D p + 7)
    abort ();
  p =3D "1e-4965";
  l =3D strtold (p, &end);
  if (l !=3D 2.0L * __LDBL_DENORM_MIN__ || end !=3D p + 7)
    abort ();
  p =3D "2e-4965";
  l =3D strtold (p, &end);
  if (l !=3D 3.0L * __LDBL_DENORM_MIN__ || end !=3D p + 7)
    abort ();
  return 0;
}
Is that the case?
If yes, is denorm_min the only thing that doesn't work?  We can then #ifdef=
 it
out for HP-UX with a comment.=