From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48) id 45DAB3852C70; Wed, 23 Nov 2022 15:45:31 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 45DAB3852C70 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org; s=default; t=1669218331; bh=cIK9QCGoG4hgjlVXjF5w7JOVUcg8vj109JsMAjoEyNU=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=Xx+mO/HQFTlB0cBWNNKO5s02HW6LUlVfW2zrN6EbiOaRwFtxPABmbvnJ4sRDyz4oP 7rFijo3ktLHFb04y0nj/1Pvap2pFwK/d1GWA9YGUCHIIvu+m/IkFLyq7mMmN6NGWiU TYI2ul20R0Dmry96gHdpzqEbDoh/7vw/R4rGwhA4= From: "jakub at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug libstdc++/107815] 20_util/to_chars/float128_c++23.cc FAILs Date: Wed, 23 Nov 2022 15:45:30 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: libstdc++ X-Bugzilla-Version: 13.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 13.0 X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 List-Id: https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D107815 --- Comment #7 from Jakub Jelinek --- Ah, we even have PR98384 for that. So either we add // { dg-xfail-run-if "Non-conforming printf (see PR98384)" { *-*-solaris* *-*-darwin* } } to the test and thus xfail it all, or just ifdef out the max case if everyt= hing else is fine. Would that be +// Solaris and Darwin have non-conforming printf, see PR98384 and PR107815. +#if !(defined(__sun__) && defined(__svr4__)) && !defined(__MACH__) std::numeric_limits::max() +#endif ?=