From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
	id 0F1A53852C5F; Wed, 23 Nov 2022 15:32:52 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 0F1A53852C5F
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
	s=default; t=1669217572;
	bh=Cp4X2cteEUT93oQeh2PlUD/dy9QG6XAeYMx6LAlnmB4=;
	h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
	b=s5Urnktcyor5dDLH6r25B9cLBaK1BeYbWGP1QsMvH7NtloTcX43vYHgCUIyr0LD+1
	 6r1XwXNPAQqpG/GT9oVbgRWP+Fp3l6k006f4OVn2uAiUCqizVXb42PpzGAP3l/EyzH
	 jwOqLZNVgx9+mjDqNlWVqm9tWEylLW2lk65Ix84U=
From: "redi at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug libstdc++/107815] 20_util/to_chars/float128_c++23.cc FAILs
Date: Wed, 23 Nov 2022 15:32:49 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: libstdc++
X-Bugzilla-Version: 13.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: 
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: redi at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 13.0
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: 
Message-ID: <bug-107815-4-keicxBP47G@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-107815-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-107815-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D107815

--- Comment #6 from Jonathan Wakely <redi at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #5)
> Jonathan, shall we just #ifdef out the
> std::numeric_limits<std::float128_t>::max()
> test in that test for Solaris and maybe HP-UX if it suffers from the same
> bug?

Yes, I don't see any point trying to fix the output here. Let's just skip t=
hose
tests that are known to fail (with a comment mentioning this PR).=