From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
	id D590A385B189; Sat, 26 Nov 2022 21:05:57 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org D590A385B189
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
	s=default; t=1669496757;
	bh=slnm94/JN7qh2y6kG/FPT+E1UDlnua9W/ZoYTz6gxsg=;
	h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
	b=I18RT2WbvivVV36al9TqfSBRBXPxt+L+TOf+aL7FCCtHXDBZWgcxyIFgm73H3BJg2
	 i7DNMdsErLXgygOkMFGGuHNs3jh451DyR/qyV+3uuDfQJtPNmhk6Ppd2CQ83b9rMFr
	 X43WkFJvvt6ONuYbFhFrHdBbYM+Or/3hPlxY/Ix0=
From: "mikael at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug fortran/107819] ICE in gfc_check_argument_var_dependency, at
 fortran/dependency.cc:978
Date: Sat, 26 Nov 2022 21:05:57 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: fortran
X-Bugzilla-Version: 13.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: ice-on-invalid-code, ice-on-valid-code
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: mikael at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: 
Message-ID: <bug-107819-4-htZlvu849M@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-107819-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-107819-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D107819

--- Comment #12 from Mikael Morin <mikael at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to anlauf from comment #11)
> Update: Steve Lionel thinks that no temporary is necessary, and testcase
> z1.f90
> is non-conforming:
>=20
> https://community.intel.com/t5/Intel-Fortran-Compiler/ELEMENTAL-subroutin=
e-
> and-dummy-with-VALUE-attribute/m-p/1432932
>=20
> In this case the patch of comment#2 would be sufficient.

I was about to suggest to push the check_variable value change down into
gfc_check_fncall_dependency, to be more aggressive wrt temporary eliminatio=
n.
But if the test is not conforming, let's throw all that away.=