From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
	id E1DD4384F49F; Wed, 23 Nov 2022 21:08:17 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org E1DD4384F49F
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
	s=default; t=1669237697;
	bh=TzfmDr9PHqM4U9gP++UCeka/bhPxhX1CyHrv2TTlIQM=;
	h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
	b=ohaf2cYBZWUofU533geDUW/GpCErk2t3j5KBAtW0pV+1E/H3segsH3QhNNJ/Kn9un
	 HNK/gE176oxMB9KR8kkzX0l6NoCfiK7aBUuoBpC2KaL+I2FN4kT1xAYsjOTtaFEmwc
	 kUlhl8PZNz4nFvrr1OYetFwcPPA2FaWQPrtIteUQ=
From: "rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug jit/107849] All SIMD instrinsics are missing
Date: Wed, 23 Nov 2022 21:08:17 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: jit
X-Bugzilla-Version: 11.3.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: 
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: dmalcolm at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_status cf_reconfirmed_on everconfirmed
Message-ID: <bug-107849-4-naPwob44ut@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-107849-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-107849-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D107849

Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|UNCONFIRMED                 |NEW
   Last reconfirmed|                            |2022-11-23
     Ever confirmed|0                           |1

--- Comment #1 from Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
There is unfortunately no common way different targets implement builtins. =
 It
might in theory be possible to iterate through them via targetm.builtin_decl
though.=