From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48) id 1E691386587A; Fri, 15 Dec 2023 12:31:59 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 1E691386587A DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org; s=default; t=1702643519; bh=3qXyhRsSf3UCNYtFECmJDr6yYELTvN5XQfXOuU/+lgs=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=wpPCES4VYEBLE8qHX62bQkxZzVDKvNh8o4h6mET5S6169Kts88sp5AUH0U4O4tqeM QHgYnLmzgVagqn5/I3sIlxqBnOZf1LgkTMWSaqkfuJuiUBJaDEF1GAJjVs25/3jV7E 9oern4BrThV+46XoX+eBPDfvDnWUbsOwoaDrqns0= From: "redi at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug libstdc++/107857] recursive_mutex misses destructor if non-function call initialization is used Date: Fri, 15 Dec 2023 12:31:58 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: libstdc++ X-Bugzilla-Version: 11.2.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: redi at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 List-Id: https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D107857 --- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely --- See also https://stackoverflow.com/a/77515095/981959=