From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
	id 9553F3830B04; Thu, 24 Nov 2022 15:13:12 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 9553F3830B04
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
	s=default; t=1669302792;
	bh=72b7iYEXgbAfWU1/jCcpneqNIzVfUWtPxqSfh0qHnwQ=;
	h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
	b=plf+nWF18scrBKhMeY3Xu413TeTo5cF6RFzCXDfb3CV1gc24802cQ48Ekz6z6uRLa
	 0lP6CYQSnq/GMTOygV/N5bvidmn5i/Fr/lN8jsDKMNBYhmmMtVEFFIlI7f0ZAGhWrY
	 M9ApBZoDcIPzRamXkdndwmDs4WZn9wvg2SPWO3Ms=
From: "pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug c++/107858] structed binding with auto type and for all loop in
 a template considered a type dependent name
Date: Thu, 24 Nov 2022 15:13:12 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: c++
X-Bugzilla-Version: 11.1.1
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: rejects-valid
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_status everconfirmed short_desc
 cf_reconfirmed_on
Message-ID: <bug-107858-4-vY4eNpMR2L@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-107858-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-107858-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D107858

Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|UNCONFIRMED                 |NEW
     Ever confirmed|0                           |1
            Summary|Variable in generic lambda  |structed binding with auto
                   |incorrectly considered to   |type and for all loop in a
                   |be a dependent name         |template considered a type
                   |                            |dependent name
   Last reconfirmed|                            |2022-11-24

--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
This is unrelated to generic lambdas and can reproduce with just a templated
function:
```
struct y
{
  template<int>
  void foo() const {}
};

template<typename T>
struct pair
{
  T a, b;
};

template<class t>
void bar(void)
{
    pair<y> x[10];
    for (auto const &[a, b] : x)
      a.foo<0>();
}
```

Note the forall loop is required.
I wonder if that is because begin and end are considered type depdent ...
But not using structured binding, GCC does not considered them as type depd=
ent.
Confirmed.=