From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48) id 69D90384F48E; Thu, 24 Nov 2022 17:45:22 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 69D90384F48E DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org; s=default; t=1669311922; bh=7OzKNqqQ3jhVvVkAU+qbyTlSdAZp1wBna9TTufZ0cEo=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=uO3TDg0VEz3LVXpNPN3EA8F/Qa3V3/+JC6CAOzkRNRNkDi5MUXknX4P7ZzW9CoH9W a9Elxi6e2OL1+IACA/R6vxbcaGBFgm83o25QguZZrr1XJnqE1ERR9OReROQYhi88XD ZEAursptIbP194ve0gje6Dwz+Z3kF20XRMQulFYQ= From: "pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug target/107860] Compilation failure, ambiguous fisttp Date: Thu, 24 Nov 2022 17:45:22 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: target X-Bugzilla-Version: 13.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: build X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_status everconfirmed Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 List-Id: https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D107860 Andrew Pinski changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|WAITING |UNCONFIRMED Ever confirmed|1 |0 --- Comment #4 from Andrew Pinski --- configure:27158: checking assembler for filds and fists mnemonics configure:27167: /usr/bin/as -o conftest.o conftest.s >&5 conftest.s:1:8: error: unknown token in expression filds (%ebp); fists (%ebp) ^ conftest.s:1:7: error: invalid operand filds (%ebp); fists (%ebp) ^ Oh this is a configure issue on how to test as here. But I don't know exactly how to fix it really because GCC configure with no option is the right thing to do for the target. You might need a wrapper as to do the right thing really for this kind of building ....=