From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48) id CD12E385516E; Fri, 25 Nov 2022 12:26:06 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org CD12E385516E DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org; s=default; t=1669379166; bh=SBLtTl8kTI2tvmIHWoCWbsZ/hV5L4gK1DajVi3ooLGw=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=LhuVVilspBOWhwjMu+hhZ7wvOFmGNc/RsKbQYkbpRFF5Yf047Ouwf962Xk27kDFNE 1GxqSFkCRnKW0TPbuw1dXXBLNQnr64JW59TULYy8WQ0MI/EgpQuALojnSkl6ZUIVmH ZDJQEZL1QKemqLgt9LADSy7Vwsr9pNHDixUKYVJk= From: "rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug tree-optimization/107868] [10 regression] Wrong code on AArch64 at -O1 with new/delete Date: Fri, 25 Nov 2022 12:26:06 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: tree-optimization X-Bugzilla-Version: 10.4.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: wrong-code X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: ASSIGNED X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 10.5 X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: keywords target_milestone cf_reconfirmed_on bug_status cf_gcctarget assigned_to Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 List-Id: https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D107868 Richard Biener changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Keywords| |wrong-code Target Milestone|--- |10.5 Last reconfirmed|2022-11-25 00:00:00 | Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Target| |aarch64 Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |rguenth at gcc dot = gnu.org --- Comment #2 from Richard Biener --- Possibly yes. Let me see if it can be backported.=