From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48) id DF3A43858C62; Sun, 27 Nov 2022 00:18:43 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org DF3A43858C62 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org; s=default; t=1669508323; bh=sHimc+e4aV2sA0qoqXky15ohQa7rOWFdiEPpPxByHbg=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=HoV1WAycnvaefL4d6SUaQdfmYXhsCx79K5mj4kIY6Bn1jDhLPAXbyyNpltsAnv5mJ IMQcKHb3RwPRGFYE1b4imMX0BTezd74RbQXKFSghw0274//Pnl73fqugvInthD1OLG iwiLl3PP601cyP6T8/nnr/dMuqHuDpgLfXiV/+D0= From: "jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug fortran/107872] ICE on recursive DT with DTIO Date: Sun, 27 Nov 2022 00:18:43 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: fortran X-Bugzilla-Version: 12.2.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: cf_reconfirmed_on cc everconfirmed bug_status Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 List-Id: https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D107872 Jerry DeLisle changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Last reconfirmed| |2022-11-27 CC| |jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.o= rg Ever confirmed|0 |1 Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW --- Comment #1 from Jerry DeLisle --- The ICE is not related to the RECURSIVE as far as I can tell. I am trying s= ome combinations of syntax to see if I can narrow this down.=