From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48) id A8E073858D33; Tue, 29 Aug 2023 04:07:34 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org A8E073858D33 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org; s=default; t=1693282054; bh=vt8eA7NjtWIkoOtb1Esihc3V+o31/2e4nlR4Biu5qJg=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=ZsddsBdEsH8PoSjND+eyZTsm+Tmhmi9NNlcIXcUkLr3mV6/2BN1URK+sj0KK3JPvu +vY2s9vc2RmlkXaKwzBi8dPr/PWZrmIeRpU9VZFiDVb0Za60cfIHCUZ9I04p+E32Zj H1MnsUOiG5GSuD+EI2XixzFyyKxY3Id5agWrvtTk= From: "pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug tree-optimization/107881] (a <= b) == (b >= a) should be optimized to (a == b) Date: Tue, 29 Aug 2023 04:07:34 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: tree-optimization X-Bugzilla-Version: 13.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: missed-optimization X-Bugzilla-Severity: enhancement X-Bugzilla-Who: pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: ASSIGNED X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 List-Id: https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D107881 --- Comment #14 from Andrew Pinski --- I have a patch which is able to optimize this to: t1_3 =3D b_1(D) >=3D a_2(D); _6 =3D b_1(D) > a_2(D); _4 =3D t1_3 ^ _6; But then we need to handle some simplifications for ^. I will handle that next week or so ...=