From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
	id C3A4E3858C62; Mon, 28 Nov 2022 11:37:07 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org C3A4E3858C62
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
	s=default; t=1669635427;
	bh=7RocoA/v/CX8rN66j8nY7fBxds6FELIc1jLNLvJrgoI=;
	h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
	b=qnPJFpNwBOHSqqn20Rdv7qkoQgX05tku/5OllClscTRBzmRSGr+es2LzQEfJT04XJ
	 zpumVQVcIo0Tzxj5B/I3F+QWiOgxbpStZJAjZ62hp2crlLkWuKIY5tKx7ZYidSLG9+
	 H0szFd+3yhb4WJmZJDLqsPdJRla2OawPeSuB23n0=
From: "redi at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug demangler/107884] H8/300: cp-demangle.c fix warning related
 demangle.h
Date: Mon, 28 Nov 2022 11:37:07 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: demangler
X-Bugzilla-Version: 12.2.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: 
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: redi at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: 
Message-ID: <bug-107884-4-KmQDL9LFsW@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-107884-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-107884-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D107884

--- Comment #5 from Jonathan Wakely <redi at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Oh, except that we pass it to cplus_demangle(const char*, int) and so anyth=
ing
above the first 16 bits is lost anyway. Should that function use int32_t
instead?=