From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
	id E0FD43858D1E; Sun, 26 Feb 2023 12:34:09 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org E0FD43858D1E
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
	s=default; t=1677414849;
	bh=A8PiI/4GkEijqjReLNFzedXBnE4brlyRdzoRdYVJyh0=;
	h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
	b=dY17pLi3aVObYndZ+1bVjcfw4CS8aJG45m6C/eUXYLf9ucWgZO9lW26YSKma1Qw7f
	 7YEVtcfM7rPU9UvPTmFbdBNSZUHpes0I8d3o1vwpwEhJFlfw6qxmMarlmwG3rKJEIS
	 oeSmNUg3du2aAxBDRwdMRifH+AJMPF9EWZNZq4/4=
From: "uaa at mx5 dot nisiq.net" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug demangler/107884] H8/300: cp-demangle.c fix warning related
 demangle.h
Date: Sun, 26 Feb 2023 12:34:08 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: demangler
X-Bugzilla-Version: 12.2.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: 
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: uaa at mx5 dot nisiq.net
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: 
Message-ID: <bug-107884-4-PPlK5BuBu8@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-107884-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-107884-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D107884

--- Comment #9 from SASANO Takayoshi <uaa at mx5 dot nisiq.net> ---
(In reply to Michael N. Moran from comment #8)
> I created a corresponding cp-demangle.s file and attached it
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=3D54530

Please read this thread carefully, currently this issue targets=20
H8 advanced mode (24bit address). Your attachment says that
the code is compiled for H8 normal mode (16bit address).

>         .file   "cp-demangle.c"
>         .h8300hn
>         .section .text

But, we have to consider why the problem has occurred.

> .Ldebug_ranges3:
>         .section        .debug_line,"",@progbits
> .Ldebug_line0:
>         .2byte  0, .LELT0-.LSLT0
> .LSLT0:
>         .2byte  0x5
(snip)
>=20=20
>         .byte   0x1
> .LELT0:
>         .section        .debug_str,"MS",@progbits,1
> .LASF248:

(.LELT0 - .LSLT0) shows the size of .debug_line section.

The reported problem means "allocated bitwidth for .Ldebug_line0
is insufficient to store the size of .debug_line section".

I think this is out of topic, should be handled at more suitable place.=