From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48) id 01C4B3858C83; Sun, 27 Nov 2022 17:56:35 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 01C4B3858C83 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org; s=default; t=1669571796; bh=qTeWXW7TcJFC5pB1QYwtozVap5BwPX370lXz4zcDBS8=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=vHVvUehTrPmRcIt30wXE664lDHu5/RIxt40vtYKpPV3h/Os4yNAu5ffVaddDHUbvg cl7Xq9CVGwUTGCPSmj1nkS9OyxTOBQbW5hPeVYQoIaCOUcT+OnQSM7gZQ0Lcn9IpvR OJQI7RZOnO12p5feQVWuGio6KG+kiptjOZorPgNs= From: "pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug libstdc++/107886] Problem witch std::latch, std::binary_semaphores in C++20 Date: Sun, 27 Nov 2022 17:56:35 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: libstdc++ X-Bugzilla-Version: 11.3.1 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 List-Id: https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D107886 --- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski --- Have you tried GCC 12? As C++20 support was barely there for GCC 11. For an example r12-10-gb52aef3a8cbcc8 improved latch support.=