From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48) id 254FF3858D1E; Tue, 29 Nov 2022 05:14:14 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 254FF3858D1E DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org; s=default; t=1669698854; bh=U3ZPDuWC7Obdb+UDS4mOgk/NLHUXPcOXDM+rzi83G98=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=jECb0J/fnF//g/vIQqmz+jdwDa8DFBnrBOcYJttgnqyEkFWVLmsqypxv4iIqmVbQw Gsb5fAw6yE7zHbsVCBmvMA1g8JJfeUdXN0OWzl6h7xDCVJE5BoeiyoUqqO5Dl/F5P6 VFYIiUKshZLGnY9dFQk0z6/PSPmxreql40qZNyAc= From: "sanmayce at sanmayce dot com" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug middle-end/107905] 2x slowdown versus CLANG and ICL Date: Tue, 29 Nov 2022 05:14:13 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: middle-end X-Bugzilla-Version: 11.3.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: missed-optimization, ra X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: sanmayce at sanmayce dot com X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 List-Id: https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D107905 --- Comment #2 from Georgi --- > I don't see that causing a 2x slow down though. Same here, yet, the results prove that not only on Zen2, on top of that on i5-7200U @2.5GHz and Windows 10, this function takes 203s, cannot figure it out, could you run the wildtest_GCC executable (or compile to it) and see i= t is so?=