From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
	id 80297385840E; Thu,  1 Dec 2022 17:59:58 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 80297385840E
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
	s=default; t=1669917598;
	bh=ek6+g3H3CHIejCt+YQnpkJxItqfwI68rtMBmfCo+RKA=;
	h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
	b=JLQEp5R1tbl9mJQNpv+yrpSShgDoVrTki3R+pW5t/qkyfPNcBtjqhlC7raIBg9DZ+
	 5jRNUUwYVh/pWOWCgrMl3TpCI0Oi4FFDv9Dxo4GE4Iy5dT0WxQO3Am0FGc30QP9kIn
	 li59byXzbbKUAc7RZR9oCJlrJSagYteFSeA8cFHU=
From: "me at xenu dot pl" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug ipa/107931] [12/13 Regression] -Og causes always_inline to fail
 since r12-6677-gc952126870c92cf2
Date: Thu, 01 Dec 2022 17:59:58 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: ipa
X-Bugzilla-Version: 12.2.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: missed-optimization
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: me at xenu dot pl
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 12.3
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: 
Message-ID: <bug-107931-4-EQgmvlzzD6@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-107931-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-107931-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D107931

--- Comment #5 from Tomasz Konojacki <me at xenu dot pl> ---
To sum this thread up, there are undocumented rules that can cause a
semantically identical program to be rejected by the compiler under certain
optimisation levels (with an uninformative error message) and users are
expected to know them.

Thank you.=