From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
	id EDB1E3858425; Wed, 21 Dec 2022 13:33:24 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org EDB1E3858425
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
	s=default; t=1671629604;
	bh=hSVQeXBtkr3GO6Gz8fchnFPxva/ODGPS27j7ORbcSlY=;
	h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
	b=mP/AVOtditoWPAePoFQSu0laeaimRAZea8m4UL+zLM+YqbVJJsAj1Y/yr+1rie6jm
	 wWeBpAjYoY6VAlKnxH5pkRe6i2avAt4vbxHfqRKQLc+xuYDiQBzzQURM9ryZi4Au8G
	 G+FVHy/iAMVh1UoCYu/iupKAjboLOa2N8NcHhhfc=
From: "rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug c/107942] [10/11/12/13 Regression] Documentation of the
 volatile style for noreturn is gone and const style for const attribute is
 gone
Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2022 13:33:24 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: c
X-Bugzilla-Version: 13.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: documentation
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 10.5
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: cc everconfirmed bug_status cf_reconfirmed_on
Message-ID: <bug-107942-4-ZGcdUhfzuY@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-107942-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-107942-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D107942

Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |jsm28 at gcc dot gnu.org
     Ever confirmed|0                           |1
             Status|UNCONFIRMED                 |NEW
   Last reconfirmed|                            |2022-12-21

--- Comment #7 from Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
I wonder if we should remove this handling?  (I think it's good the manual =
no
longer suggests it)

I suppose the standard doesn't give const or volatile qualification any
semantics (or requires a diagnostic)=