From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
	id 481473858C1F; Fri,  2 Dec 2022 16:36:51 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 481473858C1F
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
	s=default; t=1669999011;
	bh=mDGh8Svj8bfDKaReoJZvh1Lzzb2/THCNb5Grh5MaEVM=;
	h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
	b=j0UM+t+5kK4g7XNM4kiUi0NtOUTcFsOByPFdcxLZ/YtAi9WCon5fIKDF70Hup5Rx1
	 kiUnAdF5H6BY31AA0RTWMujdxAm5BXNsMCnFP6eMsrTwK8w/ReZup79D5BXQrihiTz
	 UrGPpSIfE8pQpALI/UtCrfJ/XEteSMKaQ4CTrkwg=
From: "siddhesh at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug c/107951] Invalid flexible array use not detected in nested
 structs by the C frontend
Date: Fri, 02 Dec 2022 16:36:51 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: c
X-Bugzilla-Version: 13.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: accepts-invalid
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: siddhesh at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: RESOLVED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: DUPLICATE
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_status resolution
Message-ID: <bug-107951-4-7WajMwaVE2@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-107951-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-107951-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D107951

Siddhesh Poyarekar <siddhesh at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|UNCONFIRMED                 |RESOLVED
         Resolution|---                         |DUPLICATE

--- Comment #5 from Siddhesh Poyarekar <siddhesh at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #3)
> r0-44662-g2984fe64968ad7 added that documentation.
> PR 15749 shows that at one point there was code floating around (glibc?)
> that uses the extension (_G_iconv_t).

Yeah but it doesn't address bug 77650, which I agree that this is a duplica=
te
of.  Thanks for pointing out!

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 77650 ***=