From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
	id 7EC883858C5E; Thu, 19 Oct 2023 13:49:44 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 7EC883858C5E
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
	s=default; t=1697723384;
	bh=z5NRglF9IdcN5GmZl5lHkB+sHycBaPy0idDB/PHmyzQ=;
	h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
	b=ow5HVDmarpkDv15Mli8ro6tu2JuuusJIBIVBRt0VUyYb6knEwHYWwiifPdc2/KpT1
	 KiJ5eusAiVIdgck3GtHxSA0qct6ryTG8s6fYPoRWa2GNI4jRqqOuF1QwF2FhQA2n/v
	 uFvCk5kx3qzD2DVI7YGXsaZQeZDp0S7yJ/y6PtBs=
From: "daniel.lundin.mail at gmail dot com" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug c/107954] Support -std=c23/gnu23 as aliases of -std=c2x/gnu2x
Date: Thu, 19 Oct 2023 13:49:42 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: c
X-Bugzilla-Version: 13.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: diagnostic, documentation, internal-improvement
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: daniel.lundin.mail at gmail dot com
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: cc
Message-ID: <bug-107954-4-H63r2yR28r@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-107954-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-107954-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D107954

Daniel Lundin <daniel.lundin.mail at gmail dot com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |daniel.lundin.mail at gmai=
l dot co
                   |                            |m

--- Comment #6 from Daniel Lundin <daniel.lundin.mail at gmail dot com> ---
(In reply to joseph@codesourcery.com from comment #5)
> The straw poll at the June meeting said to keep calling it C23 (votes=20
> 4/12/2 for/against/abstain on the question of changing the informal name=
=20
> to C24).  Of course the actual standard will be ISO/IEC 9899:2024 (but=20
> __STDC_VERSION__ will remain as 202311L, consistent with the informal nam=
e=20
> rather than the publication date, in the absence of a technical DIS=20
> comment requesting a change of version number being accepted, and=20
> accepting any technical DIS comments would delay the standard by requirin=
g=20
> an FDIS).

Please keep in mind that -std=3Dc2x uses a placeholder value of 202000L for
__STDC_VERSION__, whereas WG14 has decided that 202311L should be used for =
the
final version. Worth considering when -std=3Dc23 goes live.=