From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
	id A6BE5392AC37; Mon,  5 Dec 2022 16:11:28 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org A6BE5392AC37
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
	s=default; t=1670256688;
	bh=wU5HQWBrFI3ONbXAmpPjqzxrZ6j2KZAqJVcGFNuRRag=;
	h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
	b=PlBNpLPBHo2zuqL3Sdwi8ZtxMU2x3s94BsQ+xxITdOcLvv6c/DyQ30BDQH+eppyiM
	 3zT3j8PGljrRv1y67vC0T9BL5i179d3VvWFjFhdzI4LqrR4oiFQW6HfSNnyRu3rzGr
	 AnbC0N31XKGyI3kZXbILuSDvyvhaIKET66GZeWDw=
From: "mrjjot at gmail dot com" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug target/107957] [AVR] Missed optimization in access to
 upper-half of a variable
Date: Mon, 05 Dec 2022 16:11:28 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: target
X-Bugzilla-Version: 12.2.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: missed-optimization
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: mrjjot at gmail dot com
X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: 
Message-ID: <bug-107957-4-iBW25jw9fd@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-107957-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-107957-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D107957

--- Comment #1 from Jacek Wieczorek <mrjjot at gmail dot com> ---
A little correction - I just noticed my mistake. Assembly for rawr() is in =
fact
correct. Apparently this happens only for variables longer than 16 bits.=