From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48) id 7EC363858C52; Sat, 3 Dec 2022 17:05:53 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 7EC363858C52 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org; s=default; t=1670087153; bh=EA/s33ADKJIzq9qqLGM2e0VtnYNa+OwkU7PBw2hGcHo=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=M6SucKmtVsRdyBTFrrM+wRtiXkB2H0SAsgEp+Zj21i9kT+ZOssUukJFpa4YJBl9d4 OYq27ZrauGVICWD3TDi6zcT1qOn1/Cq7xAgVEvkRo79PwEfQSyobBxae3p5MbTk5J+ tha4gKbaRRrMQgmq9zvNtYkllbG7w8jNjbVgtqwk= From: "pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug c++/107958] Ambiguity with uniform initialization in overloaded operator and explicit constructor Date: Sat, 03 Dec 2022 17:05:53 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: c++ X-Bugzilla-Version: unknown X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: see_also Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 List-Id: https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D107958 Andrew Pinski changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- See Also| |https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill | |a/show_bug.cgi?id=3D85577 --- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski --- Maybe related to C++ defect report 2137 (see PR 85577 for other details on that) which GCC is known to implement but clang does not: https://cplusplus.github.io/CWG/issues/2137.html=