From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48) id 5F065389366C; Mon, 5 Dec 2022 08:18:22 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 5F065389366C DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org; s=default; t=1670228302; bh=CA5j1vyAEDKsGxzBoDnnLmhsHsW1HN09nNmakUOLuJE=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=kTA3KePTr0AZK8zm0rzx7mUgJN7iOBT6GkOnZV84VxiYgt2Wlv9yq2lNnpbNhC8Nw 59dzCh+zboaRreUjgv6JxcmU/PrBfkQtzXeS/6YmeQiwExut1MwHvCI4eUq3hMmclJ OkJbgph32gL7mgu0gBy2x8BDK5TWKpgMF8jos0P8= From: "rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug sanitizer/107963] Support __attribute__((disable_sanitizer_instrumentation)) Date: Mon, 05 Dec 2022 08:18:21 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: sanitizer X-Bugzilla-Version: unknown X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: RESOLVED X-Bugzilla-Resolution: WONTFIX X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: resolution bug_status Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 List-Id: https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D107963 Richard Biener changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution|--- |WONTFIX Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED --- Comment #5 from Richard Biener --- Yep, that would just be confusing. If "not unpoison the shadow for *a" is useful and no_sanitize("all") shouldn't cover that then no_unpoison_shadow would have been better.=