From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
	id DB04C3854547; Sun,  4 Dec 2022 06:45:38 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org DB04C3854547
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
	s=default; t=1670136338;
	bh=GGmEqfJUeAvzbphu2fkokSHhcUxTePUjo6Ds/d89CHk=;
	h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
	b=OS2NtxF+ybKb+9K/u3CVpbN55IMb8befee0N6TV1MDAD9WFoZAoWeHAo68n7KfzgI
	 4toGwSCs72sYWWWKc+IONTEnXPQJKonXRJ/g3zNUxxnNJi1O8G/vHN2WNTwQQpVu3u
	 4DDodYLbPs3RNaFYpe+MQwJWq38fR5TnEuLcx0Ek=
From: "pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug sanitizer/107963] Support
 __attribute__((disable_sanitizer_instrumentation))
Date: Sun, 04 Dec 2022 06:45:38 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: sanitizer
X-Bugzilla-Version: unknown
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: 
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: 
Message-ID: <bug-107963-4-YXJ6GWELwZ@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-107963-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-107963-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D107963

--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc/2021-November/237787.html

If I read this correctly, there is no reason for a new attribute for gcc.=