public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "redi at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org> To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug debug/107965] libstdc++ Python Pretty-Printers: Many Exceptions From Uninitialized Structures Date: Mon, 05 Dec 2022 10:37:45 +0000 [thread overview] Message-ID: <bug-107965-4-al8JLSc2Yg@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> (raw) In-Reply-To: <bug-107965-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107965 --- Comment #6 from Jonathan Wakely <redi at gcc dot gnu.org> --- Reading symbols from p... (gdb) start Temporary breakpoint 1 at 0x4022ea: file p.cc, line 18. Starting program: /tmp/p [Thread debugging using libthread_db enabled] Using host libthread_db library "/lib64/libthread_db.so.1". Temporary breakpoint 1, main () at p.cc:18 18 } Why is the location for the 'start' breakpoint the closing brace of main() ?! (gdb) n 9 vector<string> test{"test", "test2"}; (gdb) info locals test = std::vector of length 5, capacity 38 = {" ", <error: Cannot access memory at address 0x2e00000000>, "", <error: Cannot access memory at address 0x400030200000000>, <error: Cannot access memory at address 0x3500000034>} blabla = "" b = 32767 The errors here seem reasonable, but they depend entirely on the garbage that happens to be in the uninitialized variables. Different garbage will produce worse errors. (gdb) disable pretty-printer 200 printers disabled 0 of 200 printers enabled (gdb) info locals test = {<std::_Vector_base<std::__cxx11::basic_string<char, std::char_traits<char>, std::allocator<char> >, std::allocator<std::__cxx11::basic_string<char, std::char_traits<char>, std::allocator<char> > > >> = { _M_impl = {<std::allocator<std::__cxx11::basic_string<char, std::char_traits<char>, std::allocator<char> > >> = {<std::__new_allocator<std::__cxx11::basic_string<char, std::char_traits<char>, std::allocator<char> > >> = {<No data fields>}, <No data fields>}, <std::_Vector_base<std::__cxx11::basic_string<char, std::char_traits<char>, std::allocator<char> >, std::allocator<std::__cxx11::basic_string<char, std::char_traits<char>, std::allocator<char> > > >::_Vector_impl_data> = {_M_start = 0x7ffff7e2e9a0 <(anonymous namespace)::moneypunct_cache_wf>, _M_finish = 0x7ffff7e2ea40 <(anonymous namespace)::moneypunct_cache_wt>, _M_end_of_storage = 0x7ffff7e2ee60 <(anonymous namespace)::moneypunct_cache_ct>}, <No data fields>}}, <No data fields>} Even with the printers disabled (which is what would happen if the printers caught all exceptions and didn't show anything) we get nonsense. moneypunct_cache_wf, moneypunct_cache_wt, and moneypunch_cache_ct are global variables inside libstdc++.so, but the uninitialized pointers in the std::vector just happen to point at them. blabla = {_M_dataplus = {<std::allocator<char>> = {<std::__new_allocator<char>> = {<No data fields>}, <No data fields>}, _M_p = 0x7ffff7e2ede0 <(anonymous namespace)::moneypunct_cache_cf> "x9\342\367\377\177"}, _M_string_length = 140737352232672, { _M_local_buf = "\300\357\342\367\377\177\000\000\002\316\314\367\377\177\000", _M_allocated_capacity = 140737352232896}} This is all garbage. b = 32767 At least with an uninitialized int we just get an arbitrary int value, not nonsense. But none of these variables should be live yet, so gdb shouldn't even try to show their values.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-12-05 10:37 UTC|newest] Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top 2022-12-04 19:46 [Bug libstdc++/107965] New: " gustaf.waldemarson at gmail dot com 2022-12-04 20:04 ` [Bug libstdc++/107965] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org 2022-12-05 8:24 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org 2022-12-05 8:45 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2022-12-05 8:48 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2022-12-05 9:42 ` [Bug debug/107965] " redi at gcc dot gnu.org 2022-12-05 10:37 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org [this message] 2023-01-17 19:37 ` gustaf.waldemarson at gmail dot com 2023-01-17 20:25 ` jason at gcc dot gnu.org
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to=bug-107965-4-al8JLSc2Yg@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ \ --to=gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org \ --cc=gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: linkBe sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).