From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
	id E226D3858404; Thu,  2 Feb 2023 06:51:46 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org E226D3858404
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
	s=default; t=1675320706;
	bh=5Sg/RVCnDcX3bZbbRVCy5QGcE3XAwFZE//GGp1CiDRY=;
	h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
	b=G9EtU6qN1yuFrsseItP+HfjGZXYZT/XiDmtuPtfk9g/1aFXRjfz54S9Smm+GDhrO5
	 qsuBrtzFZArYRmFdvxLy0J47+C+m2IW3rvwQIVmlg4pJlgzesM2/i8GOYMfH96yh/N
	 HMUf4DK6YX0aU+7kemyCJFHX7ckdPUYGJRSFimzA=
From: "10walls at gmail dot com" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug target/107998] [13 Regression] gcc-13-20221204 failure to build
 on Cygwin No dirname for option: m32
Date: Thu, 02 Feb 2023 06:51:44 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: target
X-Bugzilla-Version: 13.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: build
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: 10walls at gmail dot com
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P1
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 13.0
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: 
Message-ID: <bug-107998-4-qceQzR5o5R@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-107998-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-107998-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D107998

--- Comment #20 from jon_y <10walls at gmail dot com> ---
No, Cygwin does not use fat objects/archives. As far as I know, Cygwin never
shipped multilib capable gcc.=