public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "jakub at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug ipa/108007] [10/11/12/13 Regression] wrong code at -Os and above with "-fno-dce -fno-tree-dce" on x86_64-linux-gnu
Date: Mon, 03 Apr 2023 14:32:06 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <bug-108007-4-V6uviUsKwX@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <bug-108007-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108007

Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |jakub at gcc dot gnu.org

--- Comment #7 from Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Martin, any progress on this?
Feels like PRs we've discussed in the past (and some of them have been fixed),
where IPA passes assume something isn't really needed to be computed because
all its uses will be dead, but doesn't actually DCE them and because DCE is
disabled, it is still needed?

  parent reply	other threads:[~2023-04-03 14:32 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-12-07 12:44 [Bug tree-optimization/108007] New: " zhendong.su at inf dot ethz.ch
2022-12-07 16:45 ` [Bug tree-optimization/108007] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-12-07 16:54 ` [Bug ipa/108007] [10/11/12/13 Regression] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-12-07 16:59 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-12-07 17:00 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-12-08  9:50 ` marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-12-21 11:41 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-04-03 14:32 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org [this message]
2023-04-03 14:35 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-05-12 12:57 ` [Bug ipa/108007] [10/11/12/13/14 " jamborm at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-07-07 10:44 ` [Bug ipa/108007] [11/12/13/14 " rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-09-20 14:10 ` jamborm at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-09-21  2:15 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-09-21  2:17 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-09-21  2:19 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-09-22 17:30 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-10-03 16:53 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-10-03 17:18 ` jamborm at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-10-05 12:13 ` jamborm at gcc dot gnu.org
2024-01-11  1:05 ` [Bug ipa/108007] [11/12/13/14 Regression] wrong code at -Os and above with "-fno-dce -fno-tree-dce" on x86_64-linux-gnu since r10-3311-gff6686d2e5f797 pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
2024-01-16 12:44 ` jamborm at gcc dot gnu.org
2024-01-24 18:14 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
2024-01-24 19:09 ` jamborm at gcc dot gnu.org
2024-04-08 15:51 ` [Bug ipa/108007] [11/12/13 " cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
2024-05-15 13:46 ` [Bug ipa/108007] [11/12 " cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=bug-108007-4-V6uviUsKwX@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ \
    --to=gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org \
    --cc=gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).