From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
	id BE6CE3858425; Wed, 21 Dec 2022 11:41:00 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org BE6CE3858425
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
	s=default; t=1671622860;
	bh=2i5qafx2Cp2std4a0FlC2O04U8ubQWUI+dphYAYh1H8=;
	h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
	b=HRbstL1jGJ2t9CY6lmp6h66/VtO5yljTG63Z6D7R4GZm6xvr69fu181/wTb1vLSJ0
	 Rkwn2P2PQD6CTK7JnTAuG9XZryHwQSYjedCZhiZJXMVmaPU02di0kk8r8T1QzzrgaX
	 frSYgAVG6OdAZ7mKHLRPyGoCXZNeKMLGAb1bArKE=
From: "rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug ipa/108007] [10/11/12/13 Regression] wrong code at -Os and
 above with "-fno-dce -fno-tree-dce" on x86_64-linux-gnu
Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2022 11:41:00 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: ipa
X-Bugzilla-Version: 13.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: wrong-code
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P2
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 10.5
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: priority cf_reconfirmed_on
Message-ID: <bug-108007-4-ctb5MUBxIU@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-108007-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-108007-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D108007

Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
           Priority|P3                          |P2
   Last reconfirmed|2022-12-07 00:00:00         |2022-12-21

--- Comment #6 from Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Martin, can you please have a look?

Summary for node main/10:
  Returns value
  No parameter information.

  Summary for edge main/10->k/9:
    return value ignored

Summary for node k/9:
  No parameter information.

  Summary for edge k/9->i/8:
    return value used only to compute caller return value

Summary for node i/8:
  Returns value
  No parameter information.


the k->i edge info looks misleading (the caller returns nothing), but
the uses are all "dead".  Eventually those dead stmts are now supposed
to be cleaned up by the inliner because of the possibility of -fno-[tree-]d=
ce,
just in this case that isn't working?

Not sure if really P2, but I guess return value removal isn't yet handled
in that code path?=