From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
	id 99705384E224; Tue, 13 Dec 2022 22:55:29 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 99705384E224
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
	s=default; t=1670972129;
	bh=d1p2RzbpzEXBYINygaotYg0NDQQLVGvmnq0SbpLDpYg=;
	h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
	b=kLJpQrSgK6DH3uKwixEB0v27AOr7SEi+d4PCBiXFIKotZ4Om5YE6EsWtLo0EaAAFU
	 6vKtGggxeGh+hXCj67mwskl5QMJYlm2tYnCbguhfKaHFoktsvBgLErEfgvvnp1H2Nx
	 ZxBZWA2lse7GO5JT8c4dgROm7V9by8j8ZQ/AvzbI=
From: "dmalcolm at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug analyzer/108028] Misleading -fanalyzer messages at -O2 and
 above
Date: Tue, 13 Dec 2022 22:55:29 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: analyzer
X-Bugzilla-Version: 13.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: 
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: dmalcolm at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: dmalcolm at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: 
Message-ID: <bug-108028-4-Y3dM1s77gO@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-108028-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-108028-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D108028

--- Comment #2 from David Malcolm <dmalcolm at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(D)  Also, the=20
        (3) dereference of NULL '0'
is poorly worded; ideally we'd say:
        (3) dereference of NULL 'q'=