From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48) id 12783384F48A; Fri, 9 Dec 2022 14:13:05 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 12783384F48A DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org; s=default; t=1670595185; bh=1VLIug9oef9bc5AZX96JRaVUNGrNDVC+9Q4BVRX1/Hg=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=mYb04xJ5+qmuukrvQ5BIXuv4+FThR8NnMVs9xAkTigamuHd6610kTZSdD8AtOm9wq HNycxd7RnyRymLW+A+ybdUUhESfqAGO2BqJyyqSELLUNlq6XnHBXsta0yYQMPJuBOE WCdpjrQWSXVIH4gEBY/7p0iTBV+vuatj50ov2s8Q= From: "jakub at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug libstdc++/108030] `std::experimental::simd` not inlined Date: Fri, 09 Dec 2022 14:13:04 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: libstdc++ X-Bugzilla-Version: 12.2.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: missed-optimization X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: mkretz at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 13.0 X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: cc Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 List-Id: https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D108030 Jakub Jelinek changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org, | |jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek --- I bet by adding too many always_inline functions that call normal inlines t= hat is what is bound to happen, one runs into inline growth limits. It is bett= er to use always_inline on the leaf functions rather than on what calls them.=