From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
	id AE27B3858425; Wed, 21 Dec 2022 11:45:19 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org AE27B3858425
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
	s=default; t=1671623119;
	bh=vhBMVTGdya01vL0HKhKJpycKZnsH7AdofxcwTBAtkwc=;
	h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
	b=nsi67RyobSAB1oiqBFEZTKdVJa7TewtDEau++F/FfVZ4KHARDVXa9JHDT1McvxQiA
	 XyAqRfIU5qQc5Tmq3Ra3bn7fLbjEZmjDkAM1dRkYJMZiBz4xaPAIFAU62OBCCGhX8D
	 Vw7AOv8qasScOjoVjsEr/PCASKMKSyA8UrsF9d7M=
From: "rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug middle-end/108036] [11/12/13 Regression] Spurious warning for
 zero-sized array parameters to a function
Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2022 11:45:19 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: middle-end
X-Bugzilla-Version: 12.2.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: diagnostic
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P2
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 11.4
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: priority
Message-ID: <bug-108036-4-bpZPRDd7rM@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-108036-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-108036-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D108036

Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
           Priority|P3                          |P2

--- Comment #6 from Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
I read Martins response on the mailing list as if special-casing T[0] would=
 be
OK and that this is simply missed right now.=