From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
	id 121853858D28; Fri,  6 Jan 2023 20:06:04 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 121853858D28
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
	s=default; t=1673035564;
	bh=XSAcSC3HW6yegJv+a0dPtZqQPUNuM1jYCihq+UWVZ9M=;
	h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
	b=GCMHA+SM7kWpFrLcA4j09qooHBj5TKLnIc1f0OFY0wY89Ogm9cL5Ou02SUzJTjqKP
	 I7w/odfxm9NEiQ7TqbB676ypt/xRQdLPSqhsbpPDx1yOtqOTntXfJxMEUIzHnGW5i7
	 G8DiQSA3RRI8QiVOrJDnYj2vEiiTrcF+OG3k45WY=
From: "slyfox at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug c++/108047] [13 Regression] ICE: unexpected expression of kind
 implicit_conv_expr since r13-4564-gd081807d8d70e3e8
Date: Fri, 06 Jan 2023 20:06:03 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: c++
X-Bugzilla-Version: 13.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: ice-on-valid-code
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: slyfox at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P1
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 13.0
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: 
Message-ID: <bug-108047-4-AA9AONmRLT@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-108047-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-108047-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D108047

--- Comment #10 from Sergei Trofimovich <slyfox at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #8)
> Created attachment 54201 [details]
> gcc13-pr108047.patch
>=20
> My current understanding is that even if nothing in the initializer is
> dependent maybe_init_list_as_range will be called again during instantiat=
ion
> with
> !processing_template_decl and because this is just an optimization, I thi=
nk
> it should be fine to do the optimization only if !processing_template_dec=
l.

The patch fixes toml library build for me. Thank you!=