From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48) id 8C7493850606; Mon, 12 Dec 2022 08:40:33 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 8C7493850606 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org; s=default; t=1670834433; bh=14Co3vCS8+lhomInJXGvP2J9FxaEuVtwgyLtkPC3l8M=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=eFyHBr7yQKfWHqr0OwVFaH/Jb1tGneB697WRWOVMoG2WOubL4qGyfw8wN/qtNrj+l lZsY/dtnaBMbr6Mv770FroLoKITIWQNuS8NZgEkWZ8zGTB/F2youYeVpO96Hqddy8A TNflE0ge8kLOpLFKvrijcwbFZsh0cjX5/Ds2+JFo= From: "jakub at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug libfortran/108056] [12/13 Regression] backward compatibility issue between 11 and 12 Date: Mon, 12 Dec 2022 08:40:19 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: libfortran X-Bugzilla-Version: 12.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: ABI X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 12.3 X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 List-Id: https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D108056 --- Comment #9 from Jakub Jelinek --- The important question is if correct code compiled by gcc 11 was working correctly with libgfortran 11, if yes, then libgfortran 12+ should maintain compatibility (of course, when soname is bumped, that compatibility code ca= n be thrown away).=