From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
	id CC6BD38369C4; Mon, 12 Dec 2022 08:53:22 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org CC6BD38369C4
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
	s=default; t=1670835202;
	bh=rbUHoFSsoERgCNC9/eMfDvEZqIQGIPIjvYK44ZGvyFk=;
	h=From:To:Subject:Date:From;
	b=Aqsdnvh/NPprEOLRvekRYlPx6oCujdJagzq14ALgOwEedC6lI1yu/Zw9Kts59nA91
	 wLz2e8D2gXOclNxwfhLnOo5eOpdONQ9b4dFs9Cq8Im9miq9tJw+tUAEzlKb2vI2+RM
	 m7Ycy0UyFGvX7/NWK+qiffTcwIGzUA30ZGrno4f0=
From: "ntysdd at qq dot com" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug c/108068] New: decimal signed zero is not honored
Date: Mon, 12 Dec 2022 08:53:22 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: new
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: c
X-Bugzilla-Version: 12.2.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: 
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: ntysdd at qq dot com
X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_id short_desc product version bug_status
 bug_severity priority component assigned_to reporter target_milestone
Message-ID: <bug-108068-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D108068

            Bug ID: 108068
           Summary: decimal signed zero is not honored
           Product: gcc
           Version: 12.2.0
            Status: UNCONFIRMED
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P3
         Component: c
          Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
          Reporter: ntysdd at qq dot com
  Target Milestone: ---

This program has different behavior on different optimizing levels.

    #include <stdio.h>
    #include <decimal/decimal>

    int main()
    {
        std::decimal::decimal64 x;
        x =3D -1;
        while (x !=3D 0)
        {
            x /=3D 10;
        }
        double d =3D decimal64_to_double(x);
        printf("%.0f\n", d);
    }


For example, on my current machine (gcc 9.4.0), it gives "-0" on O0, and "0=
" on
O1, then "-0" again on O2.

I believe it still has similar problems on 12.2=