From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48) id 85624385842C; Wed, 21 Dec 2022 06:46:53 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 85624385842C DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org; s=default; t=1671605213; bh=eA8LErQiiAP8qHbz0CzuUi/TMwmqEPJ2c6IezikAHYI=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=c+GVyyILD5n13JKJWNNcJ7QqmEM1Y325wITuklbSXiOc/YGOxHuWQ+7CPMi+NCrAf VNddSknOCRF/pbsUw/NVVE3RobVL9rsMbu+64RliqpDu6Sfcb1IMYsyCzIvmhgDooh XeQo3DFTC3X2n0DPNSjZCDYNJMZrLdME+HalWvQE= From: "guojiufu at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug middle-end/108073] [rs6000] sub-optimal float member accessing on struct parameter Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2022 06:46:52 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: middle-end X-Bugzilla-Version: 13.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: missed-optimization X-Bugzilla-Severity: enhancement X-Bugzilla-Who: guojiufu at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 List-Id: https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D108073 --- Comment #2 from Jiu Fu Guo --- (In reply to Surya Kumari Jangala from comment #1) > Hi Jiu Fu Guo, are you working on this bug? If not, I would like to take > this up. Thanks for your asking! I drafted an experimental patch. Welcome for any comments or refactoring :)=