From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
	id C75DE382FC8E; Wed, 14 Dec 2022 11:54:41 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org C75DE382FC8E
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
	s=default; t=1671018881;
	bh=sy3LlF1Qkt9lvGGyH4wuzB4gB7nwV66Mpum/Z0GWayk=;
	h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
	b=sxjDdOv6gRqfgjupSIpeQefLIZa2JFkL6mQSm2msv6GM5zO/XI/DIKmhq3EjDkKcH
	 mVa9nGD++XrdCX2+hc+PGns+1Fj++IatG1bG358CM2z4tfj4k25epvYkq64pRXGvtz
	 h2A3FKG5Ubd14ONPxBpmOSJFy8+Rl5bULNsnnFDc=
From: "redi at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug libstdc++/108097] std::stacktrace AddressSanitizer:
 new-delete-type-mismatch on 0x615000000080 in thread T0
Date: Wed, 14 Dec 2022 11:54:41 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: libstdc++
X-Bugzilla-Version: 13.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: 
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: redi at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_status everconfirmed cf_reconfirmed_on
Message-ID: <bug-108097-4-GFvrgzFzkA@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-108097-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-108097-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D108097

Jonathan Wakely <redi at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|UNCONFIRMED                 |NEW
     Ever confirmed|0                           |1
   Last reconfirmed|                            |2022-12-14

--- Comment #8 from Jonathan Wakely <redi at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #3)
> Asan is wrong, operator delete(void*, size_t) can be used to delete memory
> from operator new(size_t, nothrow_t).

Oh it's complaining about the size, not the form of operator delete.=