From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
	id 0D5DE3850871; Fri, 10 Mar 2023 10:33:43 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 0D5DE3850871
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
	s=default; t=1678444423;
	bh=oo7U/3LrzXxe/T/SJX6COZ9OIGz+VTcJsTrmwqFasCA=;
	h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
	b=JfnckNONpiNkWqIysV0vIojxP6+8mXU0QHugVWssTVY/sElud8sN2F/sMH2dD24ds
	 JsP4OtWx05H1o65PmQELHZ5csWpq7+Ol+VGG35jIwF7YoyVlhZpYJpAUoJt6GAjh4J
	 qtpd8koZc6A/4RGDplmHYosw7GbZXegbjgomPrzc=
From: "jakub at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug c++/108099] [12 Regression] ICE with type alias with `signed
 __int128_t`
Date: Fri, 10 Mar 2023 10:33:40 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: c++
X-Bugzilla-Version: 12.2.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: ice-on-invalid-code
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: ASSIGNED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P2
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: jason at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 12.3
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: 
Message-ID: <bug-108099-4-MmPtjPbQvo@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-108099-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-108099-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D108099

--- Comment #19 from Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
What about the #c9 and #c10 testcases and questions on their behavior?
Defer that to GCC 14 as it isn't a regression?=