From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48) id 06F9D38518B9; Fri, 16 Dec 2022 08:45:32 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 06F9D38518B9 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org; s=default; t=1671180332; bh=RZrFy/HmHznhT1A4LqMw9ZQNZE/S3bZkXCd84r2TFsQ=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=Sg4FJs00tsyfWEkOTwqUMMMJLLspkDkwBcoGG7tFB79vMj5t9Pbfa2Y1LNUn8W2O+ Ae5Va5AfVGSMXRRG1by/s3KeUgJFu6e40+YS/kDcMljx4EODZ9BpSiEj5WxdkR/J+s TT8GSK4smX2XiionnC7ezuY8PaBDS/OKFRuAJjQ0= From: "levo.delellis at gmail dot com" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug c/108140] tzcnt gives different result in debug vs release Date: Fri, 16 Dec 2022 08:45:29 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: c X-Bugzilla-Version: unknown X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: levo.delellis at gmail dot com X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 List-Id: https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D108140 --- Comment #3 from Levo DeLellis --- It's late and realized I meant to write rbitll but I can't seem to edit/cor= rect my post Jakub ty I'll do just that. Do you happen to know if clang uses the same sanitizers? I didn't seem to g= et that on clang but it isn't the latest release.=