From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
	id 006623858408; Fri,  3 Mar 2023 07:35:57 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 006623858408
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
	s=default; t=1677828958;
	bh=LfgeMWH2YDTnrq3opEeT5OCuc7vksexlSr9lY9wZAkg=;
	h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
	b=CQR5T9Z88KXgIKf0yhYHUZ8nnEh4WpsdEzM7Ci+6CQgLBiLQMIq47glmkWFjBSqh3
	 J17rQAP5HBaRhBV3MlHCeMossafvXfSBtVWNCGFYGQmdt5jL8c1o5PnpwThdBuWPFz
	 0Xc+zK/z6PfDkaRyQMkO+Xs91ZNh2aHdYPi0bZw0=
From: "marxin at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug c++/108165] -Wdangling-reference false positive
Date: Fri, 03 Mar 2023 07:35:57 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: c++
X-Bugzilla-Version: 13.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: diagnostic
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: 
Message-ID: <bug-108165-4-R8tfmZ4gNf@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-108165-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-108165-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D108165

--- Comment #14 from Martin Li=C5=A1ka <marxin at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to Marek Polacek from comment #13)
> I would really not like to do that, the false positives rate is pretty lo=
w.

You right! I noticed the warning for about 3 packages of 3300 we have in a
testing CI.=