From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
	id 579BA3858D35; Wed,  4 Jan 2023 16:22:09 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 579BA3858D35
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
	s=default; t=1672849329;
	bh=a96DHUd2mDexl6gUjYiBJGxVxKQlBFpgtpYAJfjc8Rk=;
	h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
	b=olm3oZbbnTAjAyMOiMNy2yeS88Xiin/fl4NYf8KHAhxCJ4kmCaelO2oM7TPr3KNsX
	 OlS24YVHAmgNpRGBk42oO75r+fuBhpvOv9fIVu99EMgYn1rg7MQeZF1MgiJmg611UM
	 3LezmsQDH6AI68ETk1XR1wvi6/qUe20x7ldvinGo=
From: "iains at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug modula2/108183] wrong code generated in the modula2 scaffold
 mechanism
Date: Wed, 04 Jan 2023 16:22:09 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: modula2
X-Bugzilla-Version: 13.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: assemble-failure
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: iains at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: RESOLVED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: FIXED
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: gaius at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: resolution bug_status
Message-ID: <bug-108183-4-w41ByAS24b@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-108183-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-108183-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D108183

Iain Sandoe <iains at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
         Resolution|---                         |FIXED
             Status|NEW                         |RESOLVED

--- Comment #22 from Iain Sandoe <iains at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
I think this is now fixed.=