From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
	id 4E8113858D38; Sun,  8 Jan 2023 01:38:18 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 4E8113858D38
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
	s=default; t=1673141900;
	bh=NOn+xZN50u66VyD4h4cwk15b1TYRWLVmd4QO/qVh4JE=;
	h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
	b=OIsl3IV9/0HS3zHxjZpfgNMpq2pHY7HuNLXHOgc5nsI6hN0AbVKBdsusB1T4hnfoV
	 injgk490tyfNAqqu8CqyatDtD+H/wi3Vy61un4RrGbLOBFRD2OSOee4benLcr7EJVX
	 M7MVcnGqWN69bMKtAj1fWnm2g2EYZJv1DJrq2EV0=
From: "pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug testsuite/108192] g++.dg/cet-notrack-1.C searching for wrong
 function on mingw
Date: Sun, 08 Jan 2023 01:38:17 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: testsuite
X-Bugzilla-Version: 13.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: testsuite-fail
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: 
Message-ID: <bug-108192-4-BUwT0ZwTpC@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-108192-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-108192-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D108192

--- Comment #5 from Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to jon_y from comment #4)
> Is Nightstrike's patch OK?

I think it is correct but patches should goto gcc-patches@ really.=