From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
	id 167723858D38; Wed, 11 Jan 2023 16:11:03 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 167723858D38
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
	s=default; t=1673453463;
	bh=Q0hCXllQDEsyYmQ1Vp1c1GTebxdF3c5am5Zhg8jOggQ=;
	h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
	b=oxnuYYjqZRaS4jeWqRLi00io5b/qf9/byWYJQ0vMvrI664HiTJZ2SfQV/cNo8tpDJ
	 Z3ag465QN1z5oqUG3OvfXvJD+EGCZ9Oj7qpoHmmtYpTiSy//giiLomsIh4UAe4GZbx
	 V8Hrp3FCe66PkA2nmlL4SGqEPmqLlQ0XA8g3Yq2M=
From: "ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug tree-optimization/108199] Bitfields, unions and SRA and
 storage_order_attribute
Date: Wed, 11 Jan 2023 16:11:02 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: tree-optimization
X-Bugzilla-Version: 12.2.1
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: wrong-code
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: REOPENED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: resolution bug_status
Message-ID: <bug-108199-4-lHZBRYFOT7@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-108199-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-108199-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D108199

Eric Botcazou <ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
         Resolution|FIXED                       |---
             Status|RESOLVED                    |REOPENED

--- Comment #17 from Eric Botcazou <ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Yes, that's indeed the plan.=