From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
	id CAA913858293; Mon,  1 Jan 2024 12:34:58 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org CAA913858293
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
	s=default; t=1704112498;
	bh=ARN23XFIL/+yS4P5rLCb/eSHVzh4jyIIEMbK8gY4jx4=;
	h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
	b=h2WjVy0NfjQFrfhMWDkMVZYtujwzZvPgj22zPiUXhv8dV7OhevR5EiUvVO66eohXs
	 WfP+lgyP7tnwFO+DO1mg/Q34l4V4WIRdAaXL2D+wlXNBFgNHbIo6mQDdrCbulM6svC
	 eSyKTXTnNgRK/GDzD43g8CDiRrYGy0Ltt+TM0+vg=
From: "glaubitz at physik dot fu-berlin.de" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug target/108208] Bad assembly? on large LLVM source files on
 powerpc-unknown-linux-gnu (Error: operand out of range)
Date: Mon, 01 Jan 2024 12:34:56 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: target
X-Bugzilla-Version: 13.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: assemble-failure
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: glaubitz at physik dot fu-berlin.de
X-Bugzilla-Status: RESOLVED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: INVALID
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: 
Message-ID: <bug-108208-4-3smGKlpk8c@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-108208-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-108208-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D108208

--- Comment #6 from John Paul Adrian Glaubitz <glaubitz at physik dot fu-be=
rlin.de> ---
(In reply to John Paul Adrian Glaubitz from comment #5)
> (In reply to Segher Boessenkool from comment #4)
> > See my previous comment?
> >=20
> > You can either write better code, or use -mcmodel=3Dlarge or similar, a=
ccepting
> > the not-so-stellar generated code you get then.
>=20
> I'm already testing -mcmodel=3Dlarge now. I'm just surprised it just affe=
cts
> GCC on PowerPC but not LLVM, for example.

Doesn't seem to be supported, unfortunately, build fails with:

'-mcmodel' not supported in this configuration=