From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48) id 9E5683858D1E; Mon, 1 Jan 2024 13:41:06 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 9E5683858D1E DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org; s=default; t=1704116466; bh=EbXg0ulujMomRScMpFFB2cBFkBRMrjufCvvlwKA9JLY=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=NtpIqWAK/FQC145AyyS5UfRj6BQUfqpJ1M59WnzRF5J3zSdW6OIyz6Vkf/EzvX6y+ rWj6Fn+4J8d2J8S1bnQnbyx0e8qbimO3qyjyV5QOZGqdPLdIiC3K7fp2oDDk2RrdU0 tqhfhLY0/DdH1ETvC9QlNmwT/Cj1OR3WzLH3KR94= From: "segher at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug target/108208] Bad assembly? on large LLVM source files on powerpc-unknown-linux-gnu (Error: operand out of range) Date: Mon, 01 Jan 2024 13:41:04 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: target X-Bugzilla-Version: 13.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: assemble-failure X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: segher at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: RESOLVED X-Bugzilla-Resolution: INVALID X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 List-Id: https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D108208 --- Comment #7 from Segher Boessenkool --- This PR is for the sysv ABI, while most discussion was about the "ELFv1" AB= I. Only the 64-bit ABIs have the code model ABI, for the powerpc*-*-* configurations. Some other architectures have it for more things, and some for fewer, or ev= en none. If you get an error at line 577996 of a source file, changes are your code = is just completely unreasonably large, esp. on a smaller target like this :-)=