From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48) id 34C71385B505; Sat, 24 Dec 2022 20:46:47 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 34C71385B505 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org; s=default; t=1671914807; bh=u8OaU5K9VQFNgRjVBVcGiG/JLpY0m1tsw9F7SjtynUw=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=K4qD/kX3R5y4NUV0gd8T8tIaRC3dY5aBhhrR9uVsnIMEeqGJmQQF8OFW8EG8nIjXO eDaWugetRbuiJAAISN6KDxiS/o2ssChz9lGJ2rYhDejWD/EHfAVcMHJNfPdLDNLxuT rLHbrGNJnVh0ux71n3TcX/tsA9VN0iC1Q+8a/mQ8= From: "pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug c++/108218] [12/13 Regression] Constant arguments in the new expression is not checked in unevaluated operand Date: Sat, 24 Dec 2022 20:46:47 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: c++ X-Bugzilla-Version: 12.1.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: accepts-invalid, needs-bisection, rejects-valid X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 12.3 X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 List-Id: https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D108218 --- Comment #4 from Andrew Pinski --- (In reply to Steven Sun from comment #3) > Bisecting tells me: >=20 > 2551cd4f9bc1afee444a56e03c1cee6899593da9 is bad > adcfd2c45c3523d74279b5fcac1d7c6c34dd1382 is good >=20 >=20 >=20 > I think commit ddd25bd1a7c8f456bc914e34b77d43f39a1062d4 might be the root > cause. r12-2230-gddd25bd1a7c8f4=