From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48) id 708683858CDA; Tue, 10 Jan 2023 18:52:01 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 708683858CDA DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org; s=default; t=1673376721; bh=s9NSGuCJyxhEfLDCp0VdMLesuS8+oYuf+uEOg6TjhxE=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=amH0ueADWzTSmG1UIM0m9ugcMJu6LR+0SO0myhfDeYiwTcxSWzCUI6F2rmS+7HqGM ZPqxbgJ2iN1gW/vg3ZDQtb3klD+1afuxOgToYQNrcfPKeTyrVhyW3MwPUlIlNBJvKQ lriQ9xAnHhxFIJN2Lr9gV8qgR1bgylv7+lfZ4824= From: "pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug c++/108218] [12/13 Regression] Constant arguments in the new expression is not checked in unevaluated operand since r12-5253-g4df7f8c79835d569 Date: Tue, 10 Jan 2023 18:52:00 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: c++ X-Bugzilla-Version: 12.1.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: accepts-invalid, rejects-valid X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P2 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 12.3 X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 List-Id: https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D108218 --- Comment #10 from Andrew Pinski --- https://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/cwg_defects.html#2392 "potentially-evaluated".=